Cutlass light

Featured

I’ve begun rummaging through my flickr sets to knock them into some sort of order. Deleted a whole set and half way through tweaking some others. Also creating a new set which is an edit from a brief phase of shooting in November outside Harrods. I found an intensely bright display squeezed in alongside one of the Knightsbridge tube station entrances. There were several small, church like windows underneath the darkness of the green Harrods awnings, advertising Chanel perfume. And the light was just beautiful.

frown-smile tiger girl girl standing chanel

In retrospect, in the process of reviewing the images, I realised I was interested especially in the women – mostly because of identifying with them. At first it was the light and just this abiding interest in the seductive power of window displays that motivated me. But something more has started to emerge. It’s to do with a feeling of intimacy in the pictures. I had a go at describing it in a submission that I sent through to fLIP magazine for their Spring issue on the theme of ‘Closer’:

“Get closer” is a mantric phrase for street photographers. It  brings to mind the slam in your face, flash closeness of Magnum photographer Bruce Gilden. But there can also be a gentler closeness. The three to four feet kind. One more suggestive of a tacit intimacy. It’s a mirage of intimacy that’s almost tangible.

Everyone and everything is just out of reach, connected by the filaments of a ragtail spiders web of common humanity and the seduction of flashy merchandising.

Although shopping is an absorbing pastime (even a thrill), it’s rarely venerated. Shops seem to represent slavery to greed, waste and homogeneity. The great cathedrals of consumption.

But I love the dazzle of the marketplace. It’s like a crazy festival where people are caught together in the relative intimacy of some sideshow of shared experience.

fLIP is distributed at the Photographer’s Gallery, National Portrait Gallery and Serpentine Gallery bookshops amongst others (predominantly in London). It’s very well designed and edited, so it would be a real thrill for the submission to be accepted.

Paying for it

I had one of those weeks this week, when I just had loads of drive and energy.

I’ve been using a couple of street photography crit groups on Flickr recently, called Grit & Grain and a recent breakaway group Street Crit.

To participate, you do a five minute crit on each photo in the pool and then you submit a photo. Additionally, you mark each photo ‘ditch’ or ‘keep’. Once 10 ditches or keeps have accrued, the photo gets removed from the pool and a keeper ends up in a show pool. There’s usually up to ten pictures in the pool at any one time. Here’s an example of the system at work on one of my photos.

Funnily enough, the very first street photography group I was ever involved with on Flickr was the same format, but I quickly left it because people were very slow to add pictures and do their crits, which were rather short and pointless.

The same happened with the HCSP crit thread – the crits became ridiculously short. The thread is swamped with total beginners and everyone has to make a huge effort to take a deep breathe and say something constructive (kudos to the admins though, who’ve been keeping it going).

Well G&G and Street Crit are currently very lively groups. So if you post a photo, it soon gets a batch of reasonably well-considered crits (for the most part). Sometimes too many… If nine people like the photo and nine people dislike it, you can end up with eighteen crits mostly saying the same thing which is a bit overkill.

So they are good groups, but they have their problems. One is that the real expert photographers don’t take part (with one or two exceptions such as Justinsdisgustin). The really good photographers who take part in general Street Photography discussions on Flickr rarely ask for feedback on their work or give feedback on others work in public. It’s more the wannabes who want that feedback. The experts already have their own peers to get feedback from. On top of all this, some of the better photographers and the pros especially, are very frustrated with social networks right now. Because their photos get ‘stolen’ or misappropriated on other sites and just generally get consumed in an almost bulimic kind of way, with no structure in place for the photographer to be rewarded monetarily for their work.

This situation of disillusionment with social media and the way expert photographers have been leaving Flickr altogether – or withdrawing by deleting lots of their pictures – has been on my mind a lot lately. Not least because I miss listening to those guys points of view and I miss seeing their photos in my favourites. I’ve been trying to write an article about my experience of viewing pictures on Flickr for the past year – a positive experience – and how it contrasts with that disillusion which I’ve seen expressed in articles and discussions. It’s proving to be rather a large topic to grapple with. First installment coming soon though.

So I had seen two needs and I saw an opportunity to meet them both and bring them together. I’ve started my own group: Street Smart Marks Out of Ten. It hinges on peer-to-peer crits, but it has one key difference – periodically we’ll commission expert photographers to come and do crits for us (probably using a crowdfunding platform).

As well as that key aspect, I’ve tweaked the format a bit by having marks out of ten rather than ‘ditch’ and ‘keep’. This means that you never have more than ten crits on one picture; people don’t have to be confused or feel bad when their vote is borderline and the photographer can get a really accurate idea of how the picture is valued by someone. The group is invite only so we can avoid taking on people who’ve don’t really have any clue what street photography is yet.

In just a few days, the group has got going with 30 members and about six photos posted to the pool. On top of that, I have two expert photographers who have expressed interest and think it’s a good idea (though they’re a bit skeptical that people actually would pay for crits). I’m feeling really excited about it. I believe it’s really important for experienced photographers to be valued and for them to remain an active part of the Flickr community.

Valentines

Spotted a fluorescent light display on the King’s Road. In the window of a Calvin Klein underwear shop.

I took about 400 photos over six sessions and the final session was the best (yesterday – Valentines Day!) I have about six more to upload to flickr, but this is one of my favourites.

I really wanted to catch a clashing colours red coat* right in the centre of the heart display, and I just caught her coming in from the left. I’d been mostly following people coming from the right because I wanted to include more of the shop. In fact, some of the shots I took yesterday (Valentine’s day… well who needs candlelit dinners when you can lurk outside underwear shops with a camera?!) I prefer because they have more context. The poster right in the background pulls you in a bit.

*It would have been rather good if one of the Chelsea Pensioners had passed by.

The threads holding up the heart work quite well, just catching the light.

There’s a socket in the wall which connects up her ear plugs and makes her look as though she’s plugged in.

Apart from last week when it felt like -10˚ in the shade, it was much easier on the Kings Road at 6pm than Oxford Street. One person every few seconds compared to hundreds every few seconds meant less clutter, less overlaps and less stress. In fact it was quite relaxing which was a relief.

I wonder if I shouldn’t have uploaded all my favourite shots onto flickr out of that 400 as it ruins the mystique a bit. But on the other hand, it shows more of what I’m trying to do with this which is more than just make eye candy.

Fever of flu fluorescents

Yeah, I was spelling it wrong for a long time. Florescent, flourescent. I stand corrected.

So I’m currently concentrating on about four projects and one of them is looking at fluorescent displays. It actually started in February last year at the Harvey Nichols store in Knightsbridge. I’d just started using flash and I saw some examples of work with a slow shutter speed that I liked. Especially Charalampos Kydonakis AKA Dirty Harry and Charlie Kirk AKA Two Cute Dogs . So I thought I’d try it and mix it up with shop windows.

This is the first picture that got me really interested. I liked the environment appearing to slice into reality.

Flash photography with slow shutter speed.

Loved the vivid colours and fine detail revealed by the flash.

There were some fluorescent sculptures on show at the Saatchi Gallery, so I decided to hang around there for a while and see if I could get anything decent. It was a bit more difficult to catch people in front of the work because they assume you’re taking a picture of the sculpture and hang back. Or they realise they’re likely to be in the picture and duck out. But I did manage a couple of interesting ones.

I like the pale colours in this. In post processing it seemed to work best with a slightly green tint left in it – perhaps because of her red hair. And I like the floating necklace and trailing wiring on the floor.

Woman blending with fluorescent lights at Saatchi Gallery

Man in front of coloured fluorescent lights at Saatchi Gallery.

I was hoping that fluorescents would feature in some shop window display somewhere in London this Christmas and I struck lucky: Selfridges. I consider their displays to be the best in London and it was good to be back where I started with this whole photography fever, a year before.

I went out for about nine sessions each lasting between two and four hours. I have to say I found it hard because of the sheer volumes. It’s the most crowded place in London and the crowds were sweeping around me, running over my feet. And very noisy. Almost to the point of culture shock. Rickshaw bells ringing, sirens, shouting, megaphones, Hare Krishna songs. You name it.

There was also this second level of street life going on that I quickly started to notice. Beggars (one woman with a baby in wooden swaddling clothes) and the classic street gamblers with little silver cups and a ball hidden underneath – they really drew a crowd.

Street gamblers outside Selfridges, Christmas 2011

The results of these sessions were quite exciting but also frustrating. This is one of my favourites. If only the guy had an expression as interesting as the girl.

Couple in front of fluorescent lights at Selfridges 2011

And the shop window clawing in a new victim. Or crowning him. It’s a bit unbalanced. I faded out the object on his nose, but it still intrudes too much…

Man blends with shop window Selfridges 2011

Girl blending into lights

Here is a link to the whole fluorescents set as it stand so far. Hopefully there will be more to come.

Last week on Tuesday night I shared a viewing of these at the Shoreditch satellite of the London Independent Photography group and people were quite excited by them. So that was encouraging. And also a big thanks to Gerard Nicolas who expressed his enthusiasm on flickr (especially appreciated as I really admire his work) and the Grit and Grain group for their thoughtful comments at the start.

Note: I’m going to try and write more frequent posts – perhaps shorter. I often have conversations in my head for the blog but they seem to be really long and complicated. So I will try to jot down thoughts in a more fluid way.

Ask Bruce Gilden the collective noun for Street Photographers

Bruce Gilden, the infamous Magnum street photographer from New York was shooting at the South Exit of Oxford Street tube station last week. So I suddenly came face-to-face with him on Monday as I turned out of the exit. Not surprisingly, a lot of street photographers love Oxford Street, so lots of people saw him and one or two chatted with him. I did say hello and I asked to shake his hand. I got the finger! I mean he put his hand in my direction, but it was firmly wrapped around the camera, and the flash in the other hand, so I rather embarrassingly shook one finger. It was silly but brilliant to see him. I was wearing a kind of photogenic hat, and I swear I saw his eyes frame me up for a split second – he was in shoot mode. Tweets flew around from @twocutedogs @sbuckton and @shuttertrip about him being there. I imagined him swamped by a gang of street photographers or whatever is the collective noun for them (us).

Here is a lovely film about Gilden:

The parts where he bosses the public around are very funny. He seems to have this uncanny knack of making people feel like he’s doing them the favour.

Zdenek Lesovsky (who works using a similar method to Gilden) was there last week and posted a set of photos afterwards that he made showing Gilden at work. My favourite is this one (sharing switched off so I can’t post it here) http://www.flickr.com/photos/zdenek_lesovsky/6527392851/in/set-72157628465312945 It’s not a portrait of Gilden, but I like the portrayal of his way of shooting. It seems to show the buzz of the moment and to a certain extent it’s a bit of a thrill for people to be photographed as though they were famous for a moment. They are just as important as celebrities to a street photographer. It also conveys (perhaps a bit more successfully than the film) how you can blend into the street when you’re taking pictures. Even when dodging around like Gilden with a flash. However, his style is undeniably confrontational.

All in all, it was a serendipitous week for me. I ‘met’ Bruce Gilden, won a tenner on the lottery and then I was looking through Nils Jorgensen’s photostream and I saw my own brother in one of his pictures! In a whole year of looking at thousands and thousands of street photos, it’s the first time I’ve recognised someone I know. Anyway it was extra good as Nils kindly offered to send my brother a complimentary print.

By the way, what should the collective noun for street photographers be?

Street Photography

I’m still on a roll with the photography – it’s getting more and more interesting. I’ve realised that some of what I’ve done fits within the genre ‘street photography’. As a defined genre, street photography seems to focus mainly on people in situ, though not exclusively. Sophie Howarth and Stephen McLaren have a good definition of it here, in the excerpted introduction to their book ‘Street Photography Now’. I like this part:

“…street photographers elevate the commonplace and familiar into something mythical and even heroic. They thrive on the unexpected, seeing the street as a theatre of endless possibilities…”

I know that feeling of seeing endless possibilities! It’s actually troublesome. I can’t go more than a few feet outside my front door without wanting to photograph something. I just find it incredibly absorbing taking photos. And there is so much drama in things. Like the florist (see picture at the end of the post). The whole creation of this big bunch bouquet was a theatrical production!

The other addictive aspect to my life right now is wandering around Flickr exploring people’s photos. The mall of mild telepathy. As you enter someone’s photostream you enter their mind stream. Wooooo are shivers running up your spine?

Back to the topic. The street. The day after my first fix of Selfridges windows I went back to finish off the ‘set’. There were still some of the grand front of store windows to explore.

Then I saw the tumbling toy vendor, working on the windows – he demonstrates his toys to punters by casually throwing them at the plate glass (the toys not the punters). His name was Ali.

Tumbling Toy Vendor

With a ‘proper’ camera I could have had a larger aperture and a faster shutter speed: the people to the right would have been less focused whereas Ali, the main subject would have been in focus. However, the iPhone had started this whole thing, so… Overall I was quite happy with the street vendor photos for a first go. I love the way the tumbling toys look like exotic insects. And they emphasise the surface of the glass. This is one of the first photos where I started looking at a vertical line between two versions of the world: staged and constructed versus organic and random.

Ali was a great character, I found him really fascinating as a performer in his job. He had a way of putting people at their ease whilst at the same time, distracting and enticing their kids to spend pocket money! But there was this carnival atmosphere on the street, everyone uplifted by the lights and the spangle. The vibe was so good! At the same time there was a certain resignation about Ali. He was a bit world weary. Probably ready to put his feet up with a cigar or something. So this made me more interested in him as a subject. The fixed smile of the pink stuffed toy in the centre says it all, well maybe not all but passes comment.

So Ali put me at my ease – ish. I’m still quite nervous about that one-to-one engagement with a person when I’m in the process of making something. Same thing with painting portraits. I’m uneasy with staring at someone so intently and they’re generally uneasy with being stared at. But perhaps as something of an entertainer Ali took it in his stride. I sent him a link to the pictures afterwards and he owes me a cup of tea : )

That afternoon (which turned into evening so soon!) I also took some candid shots and they turned out rather Martin Parr with their element of satire, especially the ‘crackberry’ lady. I’m not sure that the satire thing is me but I couldn’t resist, it was just there for the taking.

Blonde woman smokes and checks mobile

Life size Barbie mannequin and women in the street

There’s a lot of buzz on Flickr at the moment in the street photography groups. I was introduced to the Gutter which has a tight system of 10 ‘keep’ and 10 ‘ditch’ votes with obligatory commenting from any member who wishes to add a photo to the pool. There are some good photographers in the group who are really pushing themselves and willing to share a bit of constructive criticism. Just what I need right now having made a pile of work, I need people to see it. Like or dislike is not especially helpful. I’m interested to know how people are reading the work, what they think it means, what it suggests and if they like or dislike, then why.

They say the Hardcore Street Photography group is one of the biggest and best. Well they did in the intro I linked to at the start of this article… So I checked it out and it packs a punch, it’s very dynamic. With the name, the strict rejection policy and some locker room type photos it’s got a big macho image, but it has depth.

Coca Cola - Sonepur

by Maciej Dakowicz on Flickr

Grenoble, France, 2010 From 'The French'

by Nick Turpin on Flickr

Strangely, just before seeing those, I took these. Hardcore Romance and Romantic Hardcore?!

Florist creating a bouquet

Calling Cards in a Phonebox

The image above I did with the Street Photography Now Project in mind. This week’s topic, Instruction#15 is:

“Wander aimlessly most of the time.” Melanie Einzig

So I thought it should be something random. They’re calling them ‘instructions’ which I find mildly irritating as I hate working to order – my head’s already overflowing with things I want to make and photograph. But I like a bit of competition, it’s nice meeting and chatting with the others on the project and it kind of brings up surprises.

A street photography event coming up in London that sounds really good: Past to present at the Musuem of London and check out the late night ‘first night’ with bar etc. Hope they have some shop windows in there.

London Escapes – looking for artistic owner

Last year, in May, I started a walking group for people interested in art called London Escapes. Every month we would venture out of London into the countryside and ‘discover’ something artistic in the wilds.

I think my favourite event was the Swanage Pumpkin Festival trip

Close up of a huge pumpkin

The strong man and the marrow

Or it could have been the ‘Prehistoric White Horse on the Hill’ trip – it was such a stunning landscape. We had over a 100 photo uploads by members including some beautiful perspectives… here’s a couple.

Amo jumping by Alok

by Alok

By London Escapes member Alok

Sheri on the chalk eye of the horse

by Sheri

by London Escapes member Sheri

Whilst all this was going on, I was still running the Cartoon Figure Drawing club. In June this year, I started a third group, the Cartoon Heart Club and I reached a point where I  was spreading myself too thin. So with a wrench (I was really torn) I decided to really work hard on Cartoon Heart and leave London Escapes on hold.

So London Escapes needs a new owner. No way am I going to delete this group! There’s so much in here: over 600 members, albums of brilliant travel photos, folders of detailed walk info, even video on a London Escapes youtube channel and twitter feed set up. Mainly it’s the arty spirit that makes this group special.

London Escapes would be perfect for someone looking to start a new business or organisation that connects people with arts and the countryside.

A new approach that could work for the group: connect up with artists who live and work in the countryside and let them lead walks or art trails they are familiar with. Could include studio visits. There’s so much you could do with this group.

Please leave a comment if you are interested in taking on the group, or have any questions about it. And do forward this post on to any friend or associate you think might be interested.

Studio 3 visit

Today has been a looong day.

This morning I met up with one of the Cartoon Heart members, Ezekiel, to show him Studio 3 at ACAVA which the club is hoping to rent between 20 of us. It’s spacious, enough for 10 people at one time or more for a workshop.

Snapshot of one wall of studio.

We made a quick video outside Hoxton station which I’ll edit and use on Sponsume.com to get ‘cash commitment’ from people who want in.